• Home
  • About
    • TWJ People
    • Policies
    • Ethics/Conflict of Interest
    • Journal Sponsorship
    • About this Publishing System
    • Support TWJ
  • Volumes
    • Current Volume 2020
      • Article
      • Policy Review
      • Book Review
      • Program Review
    • Past Volumes
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
        • Errata Vol. 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4, Number 1
        • Errata Vol. 4, No. 1
      • Volume 4, Number 2
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10, Number 1
  • Submissions
  • Webinars
  • Forums
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact Editor-in-Chief
    • Contact Managing Editor
Contact@twj.media
Texas Water JournalTexas Water Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • TWJ People
    • Policies
    • Ethics/Conflict of Interest
    • Journal Sponsorship
    • About this Publishing System
    • Support TWJ
  • Volumes
    • Current Volume 2020
      • Article
      • Policy Review
      • Book Review
      • Program Review
    • Past Volumes
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
        • Errata Vol. 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4, Number 1
        • Errata Vol. 4, No. 1
      • Volume 4, Number 2
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10, Number 1
  • Submissions
  • Webinars
  • Forums
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact Editor-in-Chief
    • Contact Managing Editor

Interjecting economics into the groundwater policy dialogue

By James Milton Griffin

Interjecting economics into the groundwater policy dialogue

December 12, 2017 Article, Article Vol 8, Vol 8 (2017)

Historically, economic theory has played a miniscule role in groundwater policy deliberations because of its complexity. This paper is intended for practitioners. Its goal is to distill the seminal 1931 paper by Harold Hotelling and show how it can be applied to manage a quasi-nonrenewable resource like groundwater. Hotelling’s framework is then used to critique both the rule of capture era and the current era of regulation by groundwater conservation districts. The latter also draws heavily on the analysis by Brady et al. in a 2016 Bush School Capstone Report. Finally, a regulatory fix is proposed based on the ideas of Nobel Laureate, Vernon Smith (1977) that would use groundwater bank accounts to assure the efficient use of groundwater over time.

Download PDF

Copyright (c) 2017 James Milton Griffin

Tags: groundwater bank accountsoptimal intertemporal use

SUPPORT TWJ

Follow TWJ on Twitter

Tweets by @txwaterjournal

Subscribe Now

Submit an Article or Commentary

Online Submissions

Water Calendar

Click for

Listen to Talk+Water Podcasts

Advertisment

TWJ on Facebook

TWJ Social Media

Contact TWJ

  • Todd Votteler, Ph.D.
  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Texas Water Journal
  • todd@texaswaterjournal.org

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Support the Texas Water Journal (ISSN 2160-5319) Donate Here

Key Words

groundwater bank accounts (1)optimal intertemporal use (1)

© 2017-2021 · Texas Water Journal - Website by Rudolph Rosen, Ph.D., Professional Nonprofit Management Group, LLC.

  • TWJ People
  • Policies
  • Submissions
  • Support TWJ
  • Terms of Use
Prev Next