• Home
  • About
    • TWJ People
    • Policies
    • Ethics/Conflict of Interest
    • Journal Sponsorship
    • About this Publishing System
    • Support TWJ
  • Volumes
    • Current Volume 2021
      • Article
      • Book Review
      • Commentary
      • Policy Review
      • Program Review
    • Past Volumes
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
        • Errata Vol. 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4, Number 1
        • Errata Vol. 4, No. 1
      • Volume 4, Number 2
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
  • Submissions
  • Webinars
  • Forums
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact Editor-in-Chief
    • Contact Managing Editor
Contact@twj.media
Texas Water JournalTexas Water Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • TWJ People
    • Policies
    • Ethics/Conflict of Interest
    • Journal Sponsorship
    • About this Publishing System
    • Support TWJ
  • Volumes
    • Current Volume 2021
      • Article
      • Book Review
      • Commentary
      • Policy Review
      • Program Review
    • Past Volumes
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
        • Errata Vol. 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4, Number 1
        • Errata Vol. 4, No. 1
      • Volume 4, Number 2
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
  • Submissions
  • Webinars
  • Forums
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact Editor-in-Chief
    • Contact Managing Editor

Best Management Practices for Firefighting in the Karstic Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer of South-Central Texas

By Geary M. Schindel and Rudolph A. Rosen

Best Management Practices for Firefighting in the Karstic Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer of South-Central Texas

February 1, 2021 Article, Article Vol 12, Vol 12 (2021)

Karst aquifers are vulnerable to contamination from hazardous pollutants that can harm drinking water supplies, species inhabiting aquifers and springs, and other karst water resources. This paper presents best management practices (BMPs; Appendix I) designed for use by first responders and for use in developing training curricula and tools to assist first responders in protecting karst water resources. Training and tools based on the BMPs will help first responders prevent or reduce runoff of potentially hazardous materials that can rapidly enter an aquifer during firefighting and other responses to emergencies in locations where hazardous materials are stored, such as in retail centers, warehouses, industrial and agricultural facilities, and in vehicles and rail cars along transportation corridors. Emergencies can include fire caused by accident or arson, terrorist attack, flood, high wind, lightning, and explosion in structures and transport vehicles. BMPs are provided for preplanning, response during an emergency, and cleanup after an event. Future work will include these BMPs in first responder training curricula and a georeferenced database that will include recommendations for protective action in areas containing karstic features (Appendix I) where hazardous materials may be present.

© 2021 Geary M. Schindel and Rudolph A. Rosen. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Download PDF
Tags: aquifer recharge zonebest management practicesEdwards Aquiferkarst aquiferwater quality

You also might be interested in

Seasonal changes of groundwater quality in the Ogallala Aquifer

Seasonal changes of groundwater quality in the Ogallala Aquifer

Jun 20, 2018

The Ogallala Aquifer extends beneath eight states in the Great[...]

San Antonio’s Edwards Aquifer Protection Program:  review and analysis

San Antonio’s Edwards Aquifer Protection Program: review and analysis

Mar 13, 2018

The City of San Antonio’s Edwards Aquifer Protection Program utilizes[...]

Edwards Aquifer Dispute

Edwards Aquifer Dispute

Jan 20, 2015

Texas Water Journal Forum on on the History of the Edwards Aquifer dispute. Texas Water Journal is an online, peer-reviewed journal on Texas Water

Leave a Reply

Your opinion counts!
Cancel Reply

SUPPORT TWJ

Follow TWJ on Twitter

Tweets by @txwaterjournal

Subscribe Now

Submit an Article or Commentary

Online Submissions

Water Calendar

Click for

Listen to Talk+Water Podcasts

Advertisment

TWJ on Facebook

TWJ Social Media

Contact TWJ

  • Todd Votteler, Ph.D.
  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Texas Water Journal
  • todd@texaswaterjournal.org

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Support the Texas Water Journal (ISSN 2160-5319) Donate Here

Key Words

86th Texas State Legislature (1)2019 session (1)accomodation doctrine (1)aquifer recharge zone (1)Aransas National Wildlife Refuge (1)availability models (1)bactera (1)bacterial load modeling (1)bacterial source tracking (1)best management practices (1)book review (1)capitalization (1)climatic indices (1)conductivity (1)conflict (1)cooperation (1)Coyote Lake Ranch (1)dam failure (1)dam removal (1)dams (2)desalination (1)Drought (1)E. coli (1)economic level of loss (1)Edwards-Trinity (1)Edwards Aquifer (4)Edwards Aquifer Protection Program (1)emerging energy technologies (1)energy-water nexus (1)Environmental Protection Agency (1)estuary (1)floating solar (1)flood (1)Flooding (1)flood management (1)flood planning (1)floods (1)freshwater inflow (1)freshwater inflows (1)freshwater management (1)gas (1)Groundwater (6)groundwater availability (1)groundwater bank accounts (1)groundwater recoverability (1)Highland Lakes (1)House Bill (1)hydrodynamic model (1)Hydrogeologic (1)Hydrogeology (1)hydrologic variability (1)hydrology (1)hydroperiod (1)Hydrovascular grid (1)impoundment (1)inflow (1)infrastructure (3)integrated power generation (1)interaction (1)Interbasin transfer (1)internet for water (1)internet of water (2)irrigation (1)karst (1)karst aquifer (1)land acquisition (1)Lubbock (1)market (1)Maximum Contaminant Levels (1)maximum economically recoverable storage (1)MCLs (1)MERS (1)Mexico (1)observers (1)Ogallala (1)Ogallala Aquifer (1)oil (1)oilfield (1)on-site sewage facilities (1)optimal intertemporal use (1)peak flow (1)permitting decisions (1)planning (3)produced water (1)public water data (2)pumped inflow (1)pumping costs (1)rainfall (1)recovery (1)renewable energy (1)reservoir systems (1)resiliency (1)resource stewardship (1)restoration (1)Rio Grande (1)risk perception (1)river systems (1)Safe Drinking Water Act (1)salinity (2)saltwater ponds (1)San Antonio (1)Senate Bill (1)specific conductance (1)state water plan (1)streamflow (1)surface use (1)surface water (2)surface water allocation (1)surface water regulations (1)surface water tax (1)TERS (1)Texas (2)Texas coastal watershed (1)Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (1)Texas Geology (1)Texas Legislature (3)Texas state legislature (2)Texas water (5)Texas Water Code § 11.085 (1)Texas Water Development Board (1)Texas Water Journal (2)Texas Water Journal Forum (3)Texas water law (2)total estimated recoverable storage (1)transbasin diversion (1)transboundary (1)Transboundary water sharing (1)trust (1)TWJ (3)utility water loss (1)valuation (1)value of water (1)Water (1)water and wastewater degree (1)water audits (1)water budget (1)Water Conservation (1)water data management (2)Water Education (2)water industry (1)Water Investment (1)Water Law (1)water level (1)water levels (1)water management (4)water management use case (1)Water Planning (1)Water Policy (2)Water Politics (1)water quality (3)Water Security (3)watersheds (1)water supply (2)Water Technology (1)Water Texas (1)water transfer (1)water workforce (1)whooping crane (Grus americana) (1)
Show More Show Less

© 2017-2021 · Texas Water Journal - Website by Rudolph Rosen, Ph.D., Professional Nonprofit Management Group, LLC.

  • TWJ People
  • Policies
  • Submissions
  • Support TWJ
  • Terms of Use
Prev Next